FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 460.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 460. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 460. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 227 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |