FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Pro 560X
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560X.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 43 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |