FirePro S7000 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 116% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |