FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 250

In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  FirePro S7000 Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin N/A
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
  Check Price
  • FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
  • FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 250.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
  • FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • FirePro S7000 is 124 mm longer, than Radeon R7 250.
  • Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3650 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 21−24 3−4
ultra / 1080p 12−14 1−2
QHD / 1440p 7−8 0−1
4K / 2160p 5−6
low / 720p 40−45 14−16
medium / 1080p 27−30 5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

  FirePro S7000 Radeon R7 250
Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN
Code name Pitcairn Oland XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 27 August 2012 1 October 2013
Pipelines 1280 384
Core clock speed 950 MHz
Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Transistor count 2,800 million 950 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 76.00 25.20
Floating-point performance 2,432 gflops 716.8 gflops
Length 292 mm 168 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz 1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 72 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 272 Mh/s 117 Mh/s
Design reference
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3 Mh/s
Form factor full height / full length
DisplayPort count 1
Dual-link DVI support +
AppAcceleration +
  Check Price