FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 A360
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 A360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 A360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 225 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 4797 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |