FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 Carrizo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 Carrizo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2816% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R7 Carrizo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 342% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 205% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 366% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Carrizo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |