FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M370X
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M370X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M370X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M370X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 150 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M370X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 281% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 288% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Cape Verde |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 19 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1500 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 125 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |