FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M485X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 40% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 227 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 2% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 18% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Amethyst |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |