FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon RX 480 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Radeon RX 480 mobile.
FirePro S7000
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 3200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 81% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 44% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Pitcairn | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon R9 270
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Tesla C2075
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Tesla C2075
- Radeon RX 480 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 4000