FirePro S7000 vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon Vega 10 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon Vega 10 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Radeon Vega 10 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 10 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 10 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 3400% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile uses IGP interface.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 140% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Raven |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 8 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1301 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 52.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs Radeon R9 270
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 M380
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs Radeon R7 M380