FirePro S7000 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S7000 has 55% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 376 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7000 is 44 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1668 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 281% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 288% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |