FirePro S7000 vs UHD Graphics 620
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and UHD Graphics 620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 2233% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 28 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 650 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 169% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than UHD Graphics 620. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |