FirePro S7150 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce 9800M GT SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 504 GB more memory, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 420 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 308% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | G9x |
Code name | Tonga | NB9E-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 15 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |