FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GT 750M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce GT 750M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GT 750M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GT 750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 750M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 47 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce GT 750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 414% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 313% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GT 750M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N14P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 967 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 30.94 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |