FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 280
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 280. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 280. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 280
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 57% more power consumption, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 376 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7150 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | GT200 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 48.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1107 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |