FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 295
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7150 stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 295
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 92% more power consumption, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1784 GB more memory, than FirePro S7150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 322 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7150 is 231 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 295.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |