FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 670M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 670M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7150 stacks up against GeForce GTX 670M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 322 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 229% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |