FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 850M
When comparing FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 850M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 850M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 850M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | N15P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 36.08 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |