FirePro S7150 vs Quadro 2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro 2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7150 stacks up against Quadro 2000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7150
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro 2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 370 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 4100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7150 and Quadro 2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro 2000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro 2000M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | Fermi |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |