FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K4000M
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K4000M.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 320 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro K4000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K4000M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N14E-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 48.08 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |