FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K4100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 214 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro K4100M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N15E-Q3-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1152 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 67.78 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |