FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 109 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |