FirePro S7150 vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro S7150 and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7150 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S7150 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tonga | Mars Pro |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 16 November 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 620 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 18.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |