FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
FirePro S7150
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro S7150 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 190 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro S7150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S7150 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |