FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M470
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M470. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M470. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M470.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M470 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2 |
Code name | Tonga | Saturn |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |