FirePro S7000 vs FirePro S9000

In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and FirePro S9000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others FirePro S9000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S7000

FirePro S9000

Main Specs

	FirePro S7000	FirePro S9000
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	350 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DisplayPort

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 350 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7000 and FirePro S9000 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 50 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
FirePro S7000 and FirePro S9000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S7000 is 25 mm longer, than FirePro S9000.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 700 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	12−14	35−40
4K / 2160p	8−9	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S7000 and FirePro S9000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	120−130	180−190
QHD / 1440p	95−100	110−120
4K / 2160p	50−55	70−75
high / 768p	170−180	210−220
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S7000 and FirePro S9000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	40−45
QHD / 1440p	20−22	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	180−190
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	30−35
4K / 2160p	14−16	24−27
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	40−45	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	120−130
high / 1080p	40−45	70−75
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
QHD / 1440p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
medium / 768p	45−50	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7000	FirePro S9000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Pitcairn	Tahiti
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2012	24 August 2012
Pipelines	1280	1792
Core clock speed	950 MHz	900 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	100.8
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	3,226 gflops
Length	292 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	264 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	272 Mh/s	92 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1	1
Dual-link DVI support	+	+

FirePro S7000 vs FirePro S9000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares