FirePro S9000 vs FirePro W4190M
When comparing FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4190M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4190M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | FirePro W4190M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FirePro W4190M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W4190M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro W4190M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4190M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 357% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | FirePro W4190M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tahiti | Mars XTX? |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 November 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |