FirePro S9000 vs GeForce 830M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce 830M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against GeForce 830M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
GeForce 830M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 830M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 830M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce 830M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 960% more power consumption, than GeForce 830M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 830M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 830M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 830M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 830M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830M is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce 830M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce 830M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce 830M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce 830M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | N15? |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 67 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |