FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 445M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 445M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 445M.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 445M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GT 445M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 445M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 445M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 445M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 280 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 445M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 445M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 222% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 445M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 390% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 5−6 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 445M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 445M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | N11E-GE |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 144 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 10.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 144 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |