FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 640M
When comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 640M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 640M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 640M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 993% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 640M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 640M - with Kepler.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 640M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 640M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | N13P-GS |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |