FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 645M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 645M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against GeForce GT 645M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 993% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 645M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N13P-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 19 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GT 645M vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FirePro S9000 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX