FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 650M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 650M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 650M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 677% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 650M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 650M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | N13E-GE |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 21 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |