FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 730M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 730M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 730M.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 730M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 960% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 730M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 730M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 730M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 175 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 730M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 730M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 222% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 730M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 730M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 730M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 January 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 23.20 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |