FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 750M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 750M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against GeForce GT 750M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 750M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 67 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 414% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 313% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 750M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N14P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 967 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 30.94 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 64.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 27 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |