FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 755M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against GeForce GT 755M SLI, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 755M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 2x ~50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 17400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 755M SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M SLI is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 755M SLI are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 158% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 755M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GT 755M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 112% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 92% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GT 755M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N14P-? |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2x 1300 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |