FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile
When comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 555 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 6500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 2% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 35% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 97% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 51% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 40% more, than FirePro S9000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Tahiti | N18E-G0 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 6,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 152.6 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q