FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
When comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 125 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | N12E-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs FirePro W5100
- FirePro S9000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs FirePro W5100
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire