FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 850M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 850M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 850M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 677% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 850M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | N15P-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 36.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 153 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |