FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 860M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 191% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M SLI - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 860M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 860M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2x 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |