FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 870M
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 870M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 870M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 870M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 870M have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 870M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 870M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 41 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 870M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 870M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 870M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N15P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 941 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 108.3 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 120.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 82 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |