FirePro S9000 vs GeForce MX230
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce MX230. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce MX230. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce MX230 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 3400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX230.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX230 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX230 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 619 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX230 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce MX230 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Tahiti | N17S-G0 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1519 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 25.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |