FirePro S9000 vs GeForce MX330
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GeForce MX330 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX330 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce MX330 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 3400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 631 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce MX330. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce MX330. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce MX330 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tahiti | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 38.26 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |