FirePro S9000 vs GRID K160Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GRID K160Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GRID K160Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S9000 has 169% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro S9000 and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3718 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |