FirePro S9000 vs GRID K2
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GRID K2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GRID K2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Main Specs
FirePro S9000
GRID K2
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
FirePro S9000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K2.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K2.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K2 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K2.
FirePro S9000 and GRID K2 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than GRID K2.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
55−60
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
9−10
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
180−190
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
55−60
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
45−50
18−20
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
10−11
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GRID K2.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−11
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
20−22
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GRID K2.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K2.
Full Specs
FirePro S9000
GRID K2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 August 2012
11 May 2013
Pipelines
1792
1536
Core clock speed
900 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
95.36
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2x 2,289 gflops
Length
267 mm
267 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
114 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
DisplayPort count
1
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
