FirePro S9000 vs GRID K240Q

When comparing FirePro S9000 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9000

GRID K240Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FirePro S9000 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	10−11
ultra / 1080p	21−24	6−7
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	21−24
medium / 1080p	40−45	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	16−18
ultra / 1080p	45−50	14−16
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	35−40
medium / 1080p	60−65	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	250−260	170−180
medium / 768p	220−230	140−150
ultra / 1080p	180−190	75−80
QHD / 1440p	110−120	40−45
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
medium / 768p	110−120	75−80
ultra / 1080p	100−110	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	12−14
ultra / 1080p	40−45	10−12
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	80−85	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	18−20
ultra / 1080p	45−50	14−16
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	75−80
medium / 1080p	110−120	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 175% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	18−20
ultra / 1080p	45−50	14−16
QHD / 1440p	30−35	4−5
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	35−40
medium / 1080p	65−70	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	140−150	65−70
medium / 768p	120−130	60−65
high / 1080p	70−75	20−22
ultra / 1080p	30−35	9−10
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	20−22	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	20−22
medium / 1080p	30−35	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	130−140	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−105
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	20−22
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	130−140	35−40
medium / 768p	85−90	24−27
high / 1080p	45−50	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	8−9
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	50−55
ultra / 1080p	50−55	27−30
high / 768p	60−65	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	GRID K240Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1792	1536
Core clock speed	900 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	95.36
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S9000 vs GRID K240Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares