FirePro S9000 vs GRID K280Q

In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and GRID K280Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others GRID K280Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9000

GRID K280Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	GRID K280Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K280Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
FirePro S9000 and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	24−27
medium / 1080p	40−45	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	18−20
ultra / 1080p	45−50	16−18
QHD / 1440p	35−40	2−3
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	40−45
medium / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	250−260	180−190
medium / 768p	220−230	150−160
ultra / 1080p	180−190	80−85
QHD / 1440p	110−120	45−50
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	120−130
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
medium / 768p	110−120	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	14−16
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	5−6
low / 720p	80−85	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	21−24
ultra / 1080p	45−50	14−16
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	85−90
medium / 1080p	110−120	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	20−22
ultra / 1080p	45−50	16−18
QHD / 1440p	30−35	6−7
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	40−45
medium / 1080p	65−70	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	140−150	70−75
medium / 768p	120−130	65−70
high / 1080p	70−75	21−24
ultra / 1080p	30−35	10−11
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	30−35	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	130−140	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	130−140	40−45
medium / 768p	85−90	27−30
high / 1080p	45−50	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	9−10
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	27−30
high / 768p	60−65	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	GRID K280Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1792	1536
Core clock speed	900 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	95.36
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S9000 vs GRID K280Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares