FirePro S9000 vs HD Graphics 5300
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and HD Graphics 5300, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against HD Graphics 5300, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2233% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 800 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 609% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5300 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 242% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 752% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1400% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 272% more, than HD Graphics 5300. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Tahiti | Broadwell GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 5 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |