FirePro S9000 vs Iris Graphics 5100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Iris Graphics 5100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Iris Graphics 5100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | Tahiti | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |