FirePro S9000 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 26 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | Tahiti | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |