FirePro S9000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 58 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 272% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 165% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | Tahiti | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |